Why absolutism failed in england




















There was an understanding during the reign of Charles II that in order to maintain peace, Parliament ought to be consulted regularly, and that religious differences were to be tolerated. James acted alone without ever calling Parliament. He began to depose judges and bishops whom he did not like and replace them with Catholics loyal to himself. The refusal of the Archbishop of Canterbury, the leader of the Church of England, to cooperate with this forced re-conversion led James to the extraordinary step of putting the Archbishop and six other leading bishops on trial for treason.

This was the moment for a second revolt against an English King in forty years. Leading aristocrats, alarmed by James's extremism, invited the Protestant stadtholder of Holland, the Prince of Orange who was married to King James's sister Mary, and who was himself related to the English royal family to invade England and to become king. In , William landed with a force of 12, men, and was immediately joined by English nobles and escorted without resistance to London.

King James, his army and navy officers defecting on all sides, realized that his situation was hopeless, and he was allowed to escape in a boat to France. A major difference is that Absolutism failed in England and it succeeded in France. It was unsuccessful in England because Parliament had gained much control and power under the later Tudor monarchs. Parliament had the support of merchants and land owing nobles and members could be elected and changes if necessary.

Parliament was strongly ingrained into the English process of government and its status as a centralized body meant it survived when faced with the threat of an absolute ruler.

France succeeded in absolutism because Louis took a firm grip of the country putting himself at the head of government. Since England's parliament grew in power the absolutism was a failure, and since France was already on the decline it had a vice-versa affect. France and England colonized and explored in hopes of finding new trade routes to India as well as to find trading partners to enrich their nations. It was incredibly hard for these European powers to hold a grip over the rest of the world especially since the world was so large and the population of France and England alone could not keep it together.

England colonized. India which was really the jewel of the England crown India was like a gold mine full of stuff the English sold and traded. England and France had many similar economic, social and political structures. France's ruling system, known as "Absolutism", was very similar but not quite the same. This came about in large part to the industrialization of both England and France. From this new middle class formed a new lower middle class in France and England.

England and France are both part of a huge international power, Europe. France had an absolutism government, where as England had a form of "enlightened absolutism. France set the precedent which other European nations tried to follow. Absolutism succeeded in France because the monarch was extremely powerful and had the support of the Catholic Church. Although he was raised in a conservative Scotland, James had his own ideas of how he wanted to rule.

He angered many Puritans and Parliament. To appease the Puritans he ordered that an authorized version of the Bible be printed: the King James Version.

Parliament, however, would not be appeased so they were often dismissed. He refused to call Parliament into session. Did a man really break into Buckingham Palace? Did an intruder really talk to the Queen? Who broke into see the queen? How does Buckingham Palace feel about the crown? Previous Article Are buildings of historical importance? Next Article Who are the famous blues musicians?



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000