About Us. Careers Join our team and be part of our story. Leadership Meet the talented team leading Brightspot. Mission and Culture Giving back through the work we do in our communities is core to Brightspot. News and Awards See the latest company news and activities. Partners Build with us, and solve your customers' problems seamlessly. Using Brightspot CMS, Brightspot partners can leverage the freedom to choose any front-end technology, including headless builds, while also giving their customers an industry-leading end-user experience with native capabilities not offered by many solution providers.
Learn about the partner program. Demo Request Demo. By Brightspot Staff , December 08, Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email. Shortcomings of the "minimum viable product" approach Looking at MVP as "minimum viable product" is a risky approach.
Redefining MVP in the digital transformation era Brightspot looks at MVP as "most valuable product"—where the go-to-market strategy involves components of a product that will deliver a competitive edge, impactful revenue and paths toward exponential rather than iterative growth.
How Brightspot brings this approach to life Brightspot, with our integration-friendly platform and extensible architecture , allows businesses to grow and build, evolving with them and making their operations and final output better and better over time.
Third-party integrations: Our platform essentially works with whatever ecosystem teams are accustomed to and want to use. Designed with third-party integrations in mind knowing business priorities will evolve , Brightspot allows engineering teams to easily turn on translation integrations to enable editorial teams. In this white paper, we explore: Why utilizing a content hub is at the heart of successful digital transformation Why an integration-ready, extensible architecture is key The benefits of a decoupled or headless solution to build digital experiences fast.
Download the White Paper. Download Now. Digital Transformation Integrations. Related resources. Their innovations positively disrupt the industry by reimagining targeting in a cookieless, privacy-compliant way, fixing inefficiences in consumer insight collection, improving brand safety, connecting brands with influencers, digitising offline assets and offering new methods of content creation and distribution. We hope their stories will show how Asia-Pacific is leading in tech innovation, and inspire more entrepreneurs and developers to tell their stories.
We offer our sincere thanks to all who put their products forward for consideration. We look forward to reading your entries again in Top news, insights and analysis every weekday Sign up for Campaign Bulletins. Advertising Mar 11, Jessica Goodfellow. Advertising Mar 25, Advertising Mar 18, MVaPs need to put user needs and expectations first. This means looking at best practices for the type of product being designed, conducting user research and usability studies, and crafting user personas and use cases to determine the best potential ways to meet user needs.
There may be more than one idea about how to meet user needs, which is where testing prototypes comes in. Presenting functional prototypes to actual users in order to see which iteration might meet their needs best is an important step in creating an MVaP. Next is value to the project itself. MVaPs need to be designed in such a way as to advance the project at hand. That means they need enough functionality to be able to glean useful insights into the way the product is perceived by the market.
And lastly, MVaPs need to provide value to the business as a whole. One risk with releasing MVPs into the world is that they can reflect poorly on the brand releasing them.
Another thing that sets MVaPs apart is that they focus on competitive differentiation. Designers take an objective look at what sets their competitors apart from one another, and then what will set their product apart from those.
His idea is that the earliest market-ready product should contain just enough functionality to be launched, marketed, and sold effectively. Since customers hate MVPs, they theorize, why do startups constantly subject their users to them? Instead, users should get products that are simple, complete, and, arguably most importantly, lovable. The bottom line with creating an MVaP is that even the first iteration of a product should be useful and desirable to customers or users.
Without delighting users, or at least satisfying their most pressing needs, a product is bound to fail. Creating a minimum valuable product will likely take more resources than creating an MVP, but the payoff will be substantially higher, making the extra effort well worth it. Here are a few things to keep in mind when building an MVaP.
One of the first things to consider is the feature set for the MVaP. The smallest useful feature set should be included in any MVaP. Included in those useful features, as mentioned previously, are the features that set this particular product apart from competing products.
Identifying which features competitors include is a valuable part of this step. Take the first iPhone, for example. Smartphones at the time included a number of features that Apple intentionally left out of the first iPhone. Things like copy and paste, a software development kit SDK , and even things like being able to send text messages to multiple recipients and 3G connectivity. Later iterations of the iPhone obviously incorporated those things, but the first version purposely left them out and focused instead on things that set the product apart: their software iOS was revolutionary at the time and multi-touch interaction capabilities.
The original iPhone was a runaway success, selling more than 6 million units before being discontinued in favor of the iPhone 3G. In fact, starting with an internal MVP is useful. But the MVP should be expanded upon until it becomes a valuable product before being released to the public, or even to early adopters outside the company.
Designers should ensure that the first MVaP released to the public incorporates features that support the main goal of the product—whatever that happens to be. The end goal for an MVaP should always be to create a product that will delight users, even if the final iteration of the product will include more features or improvements.
In fact, rather than thinking solely in terms of feature sets, product teams should take a step back and think about user needs.
0コメント