Republicans and Democrats have both made appearances in Glasgow for the giant climate conference. The quasar J is 13 billion light-years away from Earth. But it still can reveal a lot about our own universe. Sign up to receive Popular Science's emails and get the highlights. Corinne Iozzio is the Editor-in-chief of Popular Science. Having said so, some editors may click through links to your past works or personal blog, especially if this is an important or long piece. In academia, the publishing landscape seems more transparent.
Ranked by impact factor, academic journals have specialized fields and clear submission criteria. This kind of quantitative clarity is rare for popular science publishing. With no rules written, which editor to pitch to is often based on experience and intuition. The best way to tell is to read their recent content. If you need more advice, NeuWrite can help you reach out to journalists and editors associated with us.
Start with less-known outlets and build your portfolio from there. One editor from The New York Times admitted that he rarely read a pitch from someone he was unfamiliar with. Networking with editors is another crucial aspect, not unlike publishing in academia. Where to find editors? Congrats on getting a pitch accepted! You should expect a contract stating the timelines, exclusiveness of your article to the outlet and the payment. If everything goes well, your piece will appear in the outlet as expected.
Of course, many things can go wrong. The most common thing is that there are changes in the publishing side, and your piece will not be published. Now your contract is what can protect you.
A good editor would follow the contract and still pay you a minimum for your effort. And I look at "screens" too much now as it is. Re: Score: 3. There is a difference. If you don't have an unlimited cell plan you may prefer a digital edition. Re: Digital? In it's called online Score: 2. Content too. Online usually only hosts the primary articles. I always enjoyed the back of the magazine with some electronics projects with the difficulty rating.
I would sometimes just do those with my kid for something fun to do. I hope the digital version is the full fledged pdf or whatever copy with every page of trivial tidbits not related to the 3 magazine articles. Used to love this magazine Score: 3. Re: Used to love this magazine The geeky do-it-yourself projects in the back were cool. Often things I never considered doing but sometimes motivated me to give it a shot. Can you still send away for helicopter plans? My favorite part was all the little crazy ads in he back.
Re: Can you still send away for helicopter plans? Score: 2. Remember when comics had those? Ever buy those brine shrimp sea creatures because of the illustrations? Light-weight and fluffy, but stirred imagination Score: 3. Back in the day Score: 2.
I found a stack of Popular Science issues from the thirties and fourties. Retrofuturistic covers. But solid in its core coverage of science, tech and mechanics.
Chemical experiments. Projects for the photographer, radio hobbiest, craftsman in wood and metal. The adds unique and entertaing. If you want to try a sampling from Google Books begin no earlier than Oh no
0コメント